On my blog entry entitled Marital Issues after Healing from Child Abuse, a reader posted the following comment:
On this taboo on female abuse, I recurringly dont know whether to cry or to rage because I find it just so violating. This whole “male violence” BS is a BIG FAT LIE!! the reality is that abuse is done by people. and people happen to be male AND female. and I would like to very much shout it out into the world. and since I would like for it to be discussed a bit further I think I will send Faith an email and ask if she would like to adress it in a future post so we might also get her thoughts on this ~ carolin4real
I agree – There is unquestioningly a bias toward male abusers and against female abusers in the United States and, I suspect, in most other Western cultures. When I reveal to someone that I was abused as a child, the assumption is always that my abuser was male. There is also a bias toward female victims and against male victims, which is why males who were abused by female abusers appear to have the fewest healing resources available to them. It’s a travesty.
Carolin4real is correct that people abuse, not just men. In fact, my most sadistic and damaging abuse was at the hands of two females. S, my most sadistic abuser, was female and, I suspect, a female psychopath. Her cruelty was much worse than the cruelty inflicted upon me by my male abusers. Most of my male abusers raped me. When they were finished with the rape, they were finished with me. S was much more interested in breaking my will, forcing me to harm innocent animals and perform sexual acts on my sister. She is the one who threatened my sister’s life if I showed any sign of hesitation in following her orders, and she is the one who instilled phobias in both my sisters and me. She was pure evil – a psychopath.
My mother’s abuse was the most damaging because she was my mother. The person who was supposed to love me and who society said was the one person I could always count on was the same person who started sexually abusing me as a toddler, tied me to a chair and forced me to watch her sexually abuse my baby sister, and who repeatedly pulled me out of my bed at night to drive me to be abused by a group of male and female abusers.
My abuse was so evenly distributed among men and women that I don’t associate “abuser” with either gender. Part of my “group abuse” was having my abusers’ identities hidden through hooded robes so that I wouldn’t know which body part I was about to have to handle. To this day, I am triggered by the inability to determine a person’s gender because of this. (Let’s just say watching Cabaret was a bad idea!)
I don’t know why society continues to perpetuate the myth that only men abuse because it is simply not true. Here are some articles on the topic:
- Female Child Sexual Abusers: A Critical Review of the Literature
- Female Sex Offenders – Female Sexual Predators
- Female sexual abuse of children: ‘the ultimate taboo’
Photo credit: Hekatekris
Excellent, excellent post on a topic so widely ignored. That’s so true–people abuse people. I was never taught that, I had conformed to the belief that men were cruel, dangerous abusers. It took me a long time to love and trust a man, and once I did a part of me healed because it opened me up to more love. Great post, I’ll be thinking about it.
I really get where this commenter is coming from. This ‘taboo’ is so incredibly hurtful. Insult to injury, in a major way.
yep:( and thanks for saying that!
I think you said it all.
Love and support,
mia
Of course this is a very important subject, and the statistics speak for themselves. Although it deals more with female perpetrated homicide (though homicide in itself is technically a form of abuse), the book “When She Was Bad” by Patricia Pearson is a good, easy and interesting read, albeit a little out of date as it was written in the mid-90s.
I find it extremely difficult to bond with anyone female to this day, and still have problems with things like wearing certain items of ladies clothing, as I can’t cope with the idea of being “one of them”; until I was 18 I genuinely thought that being a rapist was part of what it means to be a woman, and I refused to treat anyone like that so I figured I must just not be one. The only upside is that I’m heterosexual, so sex has always felt safe to me because women just aren’t involved. Unfortunately I’m not good at the relationship usually necessary to get it! Sometimes, on a bad day, I’m even distrustful of straight men for being attracted to women, because “don’t they know they’re evil”. *Sigh* What a mess.
It doesn’t affect me online though, I should point that out! This kind of setting is totally ok for me.
I often wonder if the women that traumatized me were more sadistic as they had less fear of being caught.
I do believe it is changing for the better on all levels. Women are being held responsible in different ways all across society.
It is bad for everyone to keep the illusion that women are naturally anything, just like with any other group. Such as I am not saying maternal instinct does not exist. It is not limited to women and all women do not express it.
purelightening reblogged this on a pure flash of lightening.
Correct: people abuse. It’s not according to gender – or even age. As an abused child we abused others. My mom HATED (or still hates) men with an inhuman passion (her dream was that we’d all be lined up on some wall and have our balls cut off) – can’t stand to have a male animal around (cats, dogs – they all have to be neutered), blames all her troubles on the male world (and not her own decisions in things) – the list just goes on. We were showered by her “male hateness”. On the converse side: we weren’t allowed to have anything to do with ‘women’ or ‘girls’ – or anything. Girls were betrayers; they would ‘get you’ and ‘use you’ – that sort of thing. You were only allowed to date ‘nice girls’ – but the thing is (and get this) – we weren’t allowed to start dating (officially, anyways) – until we were 16. Up to that point: no girls allowed. None whatsoever – at any time! However, when we were small children there were girls and we were allowed to be friends with them. But when we hit about 11, 12, 13 – watch out! The punishments … severe, shaming, screwing us up sometimes for years on end
I don’t really blame people for ‘assuming’ someone’s abuser was male. Statistics seem to affirm that. But statistics are only based upon what is reported, which may not be the truth. The truth is: ‘abuse’, as is defined in the United States (sexual abuse and otherwise) – is vastly under-reported. As a child I did not know I had been abused; it wasn’t until I reached adulthood that I started to question myself, really finding out that what had happened was “abuse” – and not something else, like ‘normal human behavior’. But in a way (I reckon) abuse IS a sort of ‘normal human behavior’ – or at least we expect it to be.
What does get me … LOL, gee – lots of things. Lack of real life resources and help for abused males. The tendency to assume “the man did it”. The “leap before looking” conclusions. The male society thing. (sigh) Lots of ‘stuff’. The excuses; the reasons.
But, reality being reality . . . I reckon I just gotta do what a man’s gotta do: “man up” and go along with it . . . pushing for some change; realizing that “hey, it might be a little bit too late (for me, anyway) – but YOU out there can change things . . . make the world a little bit of a better place . . . so why don’t you reach out? And give a man a hand.”
(ya’ll will have to forgive me: a bit ‘funky’ today – if anything is a little off sorry; it’s us. until later. Jeff & friends.)
thanks for mentioning the stats-issue. I think its def a problem in my country. no stats-no problem. no one gets that the “no stats” IS the problem. its a symptom of the taboo.
and I can relate to having a hard time applying the term”abuse” to one’s life/child-hood. The mere thought of exploring the possibility that abuse could have happened to me, made me feel like such a “bad” person.
[…] Societal Taboo on Female Abuse […]
Just thought I’d point out that there is a conference going on in Toronto this week by the ATSA: Association of Treatment for Sexual Abusers. http://www.atsa.com/ They are having some seminars on female offenders.
I’ve been told that this is one of the organizations that sometimes downplays the percentages and minimizes the role of women. I hope that everyone here who has experienced abuse by a female will start to speak up to the kinds of organizations and policymakers who SHOULD be dealing with this, and demanding that they – as Jeff says – “man up”. Or in this case, “human up”.
I never thought of there being an association for this. Maybe they are not downplaying it but rather relying on stats about abusers. I can only speak for my country because I researched it a bit but there are no or very few stats about female offenders, not to mention abuse offenders. Also as far as I know it is mainly the offence that is recorded, ie there are mostly categories like rape, mobbing, etc. so there are more stats for single-occurence offense. and childhood-abuse is under-reported anyways. we would need screenings specifically asking for female violence and abuse.
and I like “human up” 🙂
while my abusers were male, i think its so important to highlight that they can be women! Its so unfair to hav yet another object in th way of healing.
Great post,
Alice x
Thank you so much for posting this. Struggling a lot at the moment with stuff about “the mother can’t have abused me, because mothers don’t do that kind of thing”, of course, they can, but so hard for me to accept.
Gentle thoughts,
Bay
Thanx, Faith, for addressing it so promptly! I didnt have a chance to comment earlier, but have been thinking about it a lot. This taboo and the taboo that men cannot be abused enabled my m/a to committ the perfect crime againts my brother. A crime so perfect because it was a crime that according to society could not have been committed because it was simply impossible. and it had me looking into the wrong direction from where my trauma was coming from and it took me quite a while to figure it out.It came as a total schock for me when I read that females can be abusers, too. schocked because suddenly it all made so much sense.
I dont know what its like in other countries but in my country(Germany) it is only been since last year that society`s perception shifted about the taboo of male survivors. It was like a whole nation realizing that abuse can happen to men. Thanx to the massive media coverage about this huge scandal about sexual abuse by catholic priests. And while Im glad that there are now campaigns adressing female as well as male victims, it is specifically about abuse committed by male offenders only! the pronouns that are used are “he” or “him” and “Täter” (german for “offender”) though in my language there is an equivalent word for female offender…wtf!
not to mention it is only about sexual abuse. which I am hoping that it is in my lifetime that I see the same happening about psychological/emotional abuse.
oh I mean “shocked”.